Sachin Tendulkar has revealed India were ready to abandon their tour of Australia in 2007-08 and accept the consequences, following a three-match ban imposed by match referee Mike Procter on Harbhajan Singh
ESPNcricinfo staff05-Nov-2014Sachin Tendulkar has revealed the Indian team was ready to abandon their tour of Australia in 2007-08 and accept the consequences, following a three-match ban imposed by match referee Mike Procter on Harbhajan Singh because of an altercation with Andrew Symonds during the Sydney Test.Writing about the incident known as Monkeygate in his autobiography , Tendulkar says, like he did during the inquiry, that “Harbhajan Singh had not racially abused” Symonds and that the issue “almost caused the tour to be called off.””I must reiterate we were very serious about the boycott … and we were fully prepared to accept the consequences of walking out on the tour, knowing that such an action might have resulted in the ICC banning the Indian team,” Tendulkar writes. The Indians, who lost the controversial Sydney Test, were due to travel to Canberra for a tour game but decided, “to lodge an appeal against the decision and in a gesture of protest also decided not to travel to Canberra … It was a time for stern words and strong action.”India were ready to leave the tour because they did not agree with Procter’s verdict, “and felt that the hearing in Sydney [after the Test] had been something of a farce.” Tendulkar took exception to the words used by Procter in his statement: “I believe one group is telling the truth.”He writes, “That he banned Bhajji for three months seemed to show up which group in his opinion was lying. It is never a pleasant thing to be called a liar and I was extremely angry.” Tendulkar, who was with Harbhajan at the crease when the altercation took place, describes the incident:”Bhajji had gone past 50 when it all started. For a number of overs he had been telling me that Andrew Symonds was trying to get him riled. I asked Bhajji not to rise to it but to continue batting the way he was. I knew only too well that by retaliating he would just play into the Australians’ hands. The best thing to do is to ignore such provocation. That’s easy enough to say, but of course it’s not always so easy to keep your cool at moments of intense pressure.”Bhajji was doing his best and was actually trying to be civil with some of the Australian players, including Brett Lee, when all hell broke loose. Bhajji had playfully tapped Lee on the back after completing a run and Symonds at mid off took exception to this. He apparently did not want an opposition player meddling with Lee and once again hurled abuse at Bhajji. Bhajji is an impulsive and passionate individual and it was only a matter of time before he would retaliate, which he soon did.”Tendulkar says the skirmish began, “because Andrew Symonds had been continually trying to provoke Bhajj and it was inevitable that the two would have an altercation at some point. While walking up to Bhajji to try to calm things down, I heard him say ” (Your mother . . .) to Symonds. It is an expression we often use in north India to vent our anger and to me it was all part of the game.”He writes he was, “surprised to see umpire Mark Benson go up to Bhajji and speak to him. While the umpire was talking to Bhajji, some of the Australian players started to warn him of the dire consequences of his words, presumably to rattle him and disturb his concentration. The ploy paid off when a few overs later Bhajji was out for 63.”At that stage Tendulkar said he thought the “matter had ended” with Harbhajan being dismissed, but was surprised a formal complaint had been lodged with the allegation of Harbhajan having called Symonds a “monkey” – a racial insult. “What surprised me most was the haste with which the Australians had lodged their complaint.” Tendulkar said he found out later that during Australia’s tour of India in October 2007, following an incident in Mumbai, the two boards had instructed their captains to report any incident with “racial elements” to the match referee. “Even so, I still believe that the matter would not have been blown so out of proportion if Ponting had discussed it with the captain Anil Kumble, Harbhajan and the Indian team management before reporting the incident to Mike Procter, the match referee. In turn, Mike Procter could also have handled the matter with a little more sensitivity.”After the incident, Tendulkar writes the Sydney Test “assumed a completely different character” and describes the Indians fighting to save the match in the face of a spate of controversial umpiring decisions and what he calls, “rather unsportsmanlike conduct” by some of the Australians.”By the fifth day we were batting to save the game. Mind you, there is little doubt in my mind that we would have drawn had it not been for what seemed to us to be mistakes by the umpires and some rather unsportsmanlike conduct by a few of the Australian players. Rahul Dravid was given out caught behind off Symonds for 38 by umpire Bucknor when his bat seemed to be a fair distance away from the ball. The wicketkeeper Adam Gilchrist was standing up to the stumps at the time and was in the best position to see if the ball had touched Rahul’s bat. Yet he who prided himself on walking off if he nicked the ball appealed for the caught-behind and to our disbelief we saw the umpire raise the finger. It was a shocking decision. Some of us actually wondered if Rahul had been given out lbw.”Following Dravid’s dismissal, Ganguly was given out when, “Michael Clarke and Ricky Ponting decided to appeal for what we thought was a grassed catch at slip. Finally, umpire Bucknor gave Dhoni out leg-before when to us the ball would clearly have missed the stumps. It seemed that every decision that could go against us had done so.”Despite the nature of the defeat, Tendulkar says he made it a point to, “go out and congratulate the Australians, regardless of all the controversy and disappointment.” His gesture was reciprocated in Perth, when after India’s historic victory, “Brett Lee and Adam Gilchrist also came to our dressing room to congratulate us and it was a gesture that was much appreciated.” The team had arrived in Perth, “with a sense of purpose. We all felt hurt by what had transpired in Sydney and the best way to vent our anger was on the cricket field. And that is what we did.”
